Supply Chain Cost Modeling
Supply chain cost modeling provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing and optimizing the total cost of procuring, storing, and delivering electronic components and finished products. In the electronics industry, where components may travel through multiple countries before final assembly, understanding the true cost of supply chain decisions is essential for maintaining competitiveness and profitability. These models capture visible costs like freight and tariffs alongside hidden expenses such as inventory carrying costs, currency fluctuations, and supplier risk premiums.
Modern electronics supply chains are characterized by global sourcing, just-in-time delivery requirements, and rapidly changing demand patterns. Effective cost modeling enables organizations to make informed decisions about supplier selection, inventory strategies, transportation modes, and geographic distribution of manufacturing operations. By quantifying the total cost implications of supply chain alternatives, companies can optimize their networks for both cost efficiency and resilience.
Logistics Cost Modeling
Logistics costs encompass all expenses associated with moving materials and products through the supply chain, from raw materials at suppliers through manufacturing to final delivery. For electronics products, logistics typically represent 5-15% of total product cost, though this percentage varies significantly based on product value density, geographic scope, and delivery requirements.
Transportation Cost Components
Transportation expenses include base freight charges, fuel surcharges, accessorial fees, and insurance costs. Ocean freight for electronics components from Asia to North America typically costs $3,000-5,000 per forty-foot container equivalent, while air freight ranges from $4-8 per kilogram depending on volume and urgency. Ground transportation within regions adds $500-2,000 per shipment for full truckload movements. The mode selection between ocean, air, and ground fundamentally shapes both cost and lead time, requiring careful analysis of total cost implications rather than focusing solely on freight rates.
Handling and Processing Costs
Materials moving through supply chains incur handling costs at each node: unloading, inspection, put-away, picking, packing, and loading operations. Warehouse handling typically costs $15-50 per pallet touch, with electronics requiring additional care due to ESD sensitivity and value concentration. Cross-docking operations that minimize handling can reduce these costs by 40-60% compared to traditional warehousing, though they require precise coordination and may sacrifice inventory buffering benefits.
Documentation and Compliance
International electronics shipments require extensive documentation: commercial invoices, packing lists, certificates of origin, customs entries, and potentially export licenses for controlled technologies. Each document set costs $50-200 to prepare and process, with errors causing delays that can cost thousands of dollars in expediting fees or production disruptions. Compliance costs for restricted substances (RoHS, REACH), conflict minerals reporting, and security programs (C-TPAT, AEO) add ongoing expenses that must be incorporated into logistics cost models.
Total Logistics Cost Analysis
Comprehensive logistics cost analysis considers the interaction between transportation mode, inventory levels, and service requirements. Slower ocean freight reduces transportation cost but increases pipeline inventory and requires larger safety stocks. Air freight eliminates weeks of transit time but at 8-10 times the ocean freight cost per kilogram. The optimal solution depends on product value, demand variability, and customer service requirements. For high-value electronics with volatile demand, the inventory savings from air freight often justify its premium, while stable-demand commodity components favor ocean transport.
Inventory Carrying Costs
Inventory carrying costs represent the total expense of holding stock throughout the supply chain, typically ranging from 15-35% of inventory value annually for electronics. These costs are often underestimated because many components are hidden in overhead allocations rather than explicitly tracked against inventory levels.
Capital Cost of Inventory
The largest carrying cost component is the opportunity cost of capital tied up in inventory. Electronics companies typically use hurdle rates of 10-20% annually for inventory investment, reflecting the return this capital could earn in alternative uses. A company holding $50 million in average inventory at 15% cost of capital incurs $7.5 million annually in capital carrying costs alone. This cost applies equally to raw materials, work-in-process, and finished goods throughout the supply chain.
Storage and Handling Expenses
Physical storage costs include warehouse space, equipment, utilities, and labor for inventory management. Electronics storage requirements often exceed standard warehousing due to climate control, ESD protection, and security needs. Storage costs typically range from $6-15 per pallet position monthly, or $0.20-0.50 per square foot for bulk storage. Specialized storage for moisture-sensitive devices requiring dry cabinets or controlled environments can cost 2-3 times standard rates.
Obsolescence and Depreciation
Electronics inventory faces significant obsolescence risk as product lifecycles shorten and technology advances rapidly. Industry studies suggest 2-5% annual obsolescence for active components, rising to 10-20% for specialty or end-of-life parts. Beyond complete obsolescence, inventory value deteriorates as components age, with many manufacturers requiring date codes within 2-3 years of current for production use. This depreciation risk compounds as inventory sits, making holding costs effectively increase the longer materials remain in stock.
Insurance, Taxes, and Shrinkage
Insurance on electronics inventory typically costs 0.1-0.5% of value annually, with rates varying based on storage conditions, security, and loss history. Property taxes apply to inventory in many jurisdictions, adding 0.5-2% annually depending on location. Shrinkage from damage, loss, and theft typically runs 0.3-1% for well-managed electronics operations but can exceed 2-3% without proper controls. Together, these costs add 1-3.5% to annual carrying cost rates.
Calculating Total Carrying Cost Rate
A representative total carrying cost calculation for electronics inventory might include: capital cost (15%), storage and handling (4%), obsolescence risk (3%), insurance and taxes (1.5%), and shrinkage (0.5%), totaling 24% annually. This rate means that $1 million in inventory costs $240,000 per year to hold, making inventory optimization a significant leverage point for cost reduction. Accurate carrying cost rates are essential inputs for inventory policy decisions including safety stock levels, order quantities, and network design.
Tariff and Duty Calculators
Tariffs and duties represent significant costs for internationally-sourced electronics, often adding 0-25% to landed costs depending on product classification, country of origin, and applicable trade agreements. Accurate duty calculation requires understanding harmonized tariff codes, trade preference programs, and the complex rules governing electronics imports.
Harmonized System Classification
The Harmonized System (HS) provides standardized six-digit codes for classifying traded goods internationally, with countries adding additional digits for national tariff schedules. Electronics products fall primarily under HS chapters 84 (machinery), 85 (electrical equipment), and 90 (instruments). Proper classification determines applicable duty rates, which can vary dramatically even within electronics: finished smartphones may enter duty-free under information technology agreements, while components attract 0-8% duties, and certain equipment faces rates of 10-25%. Misclassification risks penalties, delayed shipments, and unexpected duty expenses.
Trade Preference Programs
Numerous free trade agreements and preference programs offer reduced or eliminated duties for qualifying electronics. USMCA eliminates duties on North American-origin products, while various bilateral agreements provide preferences for qualifying goods. Preference qualification requires meeting rules of origin that typically mandate substantial transformation or regional value content thresholds. For electronics, these rules often require 45-65% regional value content or significant manufacturing operations beyond simple assembly. Properly documenting and claiming preferences can save millions in duties annually for major importers.
Duty Calculation Methods
Duties may be calculated ad valorem (percentage of value), specific (fixed amount per unit or weight), or compound (combination of both). Most electronics duties are ad valorem, applied to transaction value including freight and insurance to the port of import (CIF basis for many countries, FOB for the United States). First sale valuation, when applicable, allows basing duties on the manufacturer's price rather than the middleman's price, potentially reducing duty expense by 5-15% when multiple sales occur before import. Duty calculation tools must handle these variations accurately to predict landed costs.
Special Duty Programs
Several programs offer duty relief for specific circumstances. Temporary imports for testing, demonstration, or repair can enter under temporary import bond provisions with no duty payment. Foreign trade zones allow deferral or elimination of duties on goods stored, processed, or assembled within designated areas. Duty drawback programs refund duties paid on imported materials that are subsequently exported in manufactured products. These programs require careful compliance but can generate substantial savings for eligible operations.
Duty Cost Modeling Integration
Effective supply chain cost models integrate duty calculations with sourcing and logistics decisions. Choosing between suppliers in different countries requires comparing not just quoted prices but landed costs including applicable duties. Manufacturing location decisions must consider duty implications of importing materials versus exporting finished products. Trade policy changes can dramatically alter cost structures overnight, making scenario modeling of duty rate changes essential for supply chain planning.
Currency Risk Assessment
Electronics supply chains spanning multiple countries expose organizations to currency exchange rate fluctuations that can significantly impact costs and profitability. A 10% currency movement can swing the cost advantage between suppliers or manufacturing locations, making currency risk assessment an essential element of supply chain cost modeling.
Transaction Exposure
Transaction exposure arises from committed or anticipated foreign currency payments or receipts. A U.S. company purchasing components from a Japanese supplier with 90-day payment terms faces yen appreciation risk that could increase dollar costs before payment. Transaction exposure can be quantified based on forecast foreign currency cash flows and their timing, typically measured using value-at-risk methodologies that estimate potential cost variations at specified confidence levels.
Economic Exposure
Beyond individual transactions, currency movements affect the fundamental competitiveness of supply chain configurations. A manufacturer sourcing in Asia and selling in Europe faces compounding exposure as both purchase costs and sales revenues fluctuate with exchange rates. Economic exposure analysis examines how currency movements affect total profitability by simultaneously impacting costs, revenues, and competitive positioning. This broader exposure often exceeds transaction-level risks and is harder to hedge.
Natural Hedging Strategies
Natural hedging reduces currency exposure by matching foreign currency costs and revenues or distributing operations across currency zones. A company selling in euros might source from European suppliers to match revenue and cost currencies, eliminating exposure on that portion of business. Manufacturing in multiple regions provides operational flexibility to shift production toward favorable currency environments. These strategies reduce exposure without the costs and complexity of financial hedging instruments.
Financial Hedging Instruments
Forward contracts, options, and other derivatives provide tools for managing currency exposure when natural hedging proves insufficient. Forward contracts lock in exchange rates for future transactions, eliminating uncertainty but also preventing benefit from favorable movements. Currency options provide downside protection while preserving upside potential, but require premium payments that increase costs. The appropriate hedging strategy depends on exposure magnitude, risk tolerance, and the cost of hedging instruments relative to exposure value.
Currency-Adjusted Cost Modeling
Supply chain cost models should incorporate currency scenarios rather than assuming stable exchange rates. Sensitivity analysis testing cost structures against historical currency volatility reveals which supply chain configurations maintain cost competitiveness across exchange rate environments. Scenario planning for currency movements of 10-20% helps identify configurations that prove robust against currency risk, even if they don't minimize costs under current exchange rates.
Supplier Cost Models
Supplier cost models deconstruct quoted prices into underlying cost components, enabling more informed sourcing decisions, negotiation strategies, and partnership development. Understanding what drives supplier costs helps identify improvement opportunities and ensures that quoted prices fairly reflect actual cost structures.
Should-Cost Analysis
Should-cost analysis estimates what a product or component should cost based on material content, manufacturing processes, labor requirements, and reasonable overhead and profit margins. For electronic components, this involves identifying bill of materials costs, estimating processing times and labor rates, allocating equipment and facility costs, and adding appropriate margins. Comparing should-cost estimates to quoted prices reveals suppliers charging excessive premiums or potentially cutting corners on quality to achieve unsustainably low prices.
Material Cost Components
Raw materials typically represent 30-60% of component costs for electronics, with precious metals, rare earths, and specialty materials driving significant cost variation. Semiconductor devices depend on silicon wafer costs, gold and copper for bonding wires, and specialized substrates. Passive components require ceramic, polymer, or metal film materials with costs fluctuating based on commodity markets. Understanding material cost drivers enables better forecasting of price trends and identification of opportunities for specification changes that reduce material costs.
Manufacturing Process Costs
Conversion costs include equipment depreciation, direct labor, utilities, and consumables required to transform materials into finished components. Semiconductor fabrication involves billions of dollars in equipment amortized across production volumes, making per-unit costs highly sensitive to capacity utilization. Assembly operations depend more heavily on labor costs, creating geographic variations as wage rates differ across regions. Process cost modeling requires understanding equipment utilization, labor productivity, yield rates, and overhead allocation methodologies.
Supplier Overhead and Margins
Supplier prices include allocations for overhead functions (engineering, quality, sales, administration) and profit margins. Overhead typically adds 10-30% to direct costs, while profit margins range from 5-25% depending on competitive dynamics, customer bargaining power, and product differentiation. Understanding these components helps assess price reasonableness and identify negotiation opportunities. Excessive overhead allocations or margins suggest room for negotiation, while margins below sustainable levels indicate suppliers who may cut quality or fail financially.
Total Cost of Ownership
Supplier cost models should extend beyond quoted prices to capture total cost of ownership including quality costs, delivery performance impacts, technical support value, and relationship management expenses. A supplier with higher unit prices but superior quality may deliver lower total cost through reduced inspection, rework, and warranty expenses. Similarly, reliable delivery performance eliminates expediting costs and production disruptions that can exceed apparent price differences between suppliers.
Transportation Optimization
Transportation optimization balances cost, speed, reliability, and environmental impact to determine the most effective approach for moving materials through the supply chain. Sophisticated optimization considers mode selection, routing, consolidation opportunities, and carrier management to minimize total logistics costs while meeting service requirements.
Mode Selection Analysis
Mode selection represents the most fundamental transportation decision, with dramatically different cost and time profiles. Ocean freight offers lowest cost ($0.05-0.15 per kilogram) but requires 2-6 weeks transit time. Air freight provides speed (1-3 days) at much higher cost ($4-8 per kilogram). Ground transportation covers intermediate distances at $0.30-1.00 per kilogram with transit times measured in days. Rail offers cost advantages over trucking for longer distances but with less flexibility. Optimization models determine the optimal mode mix based on product value, demand patterns, and service requirements.
Routing and Network Design
Transportation networks should minimize total distance and handling while meeting delivery requirements. Direct shipments avoid intermediate handling but may not achieve transportation economies. Hub-and-spoke networks concentrate volumes for trunk haul efficiency but add handling and time at hub facilities. Milk run routing efficiently serves multiple pickup or delivery points on single vehicle trips. Network optimization tools model these alternatives to identify configurations minimizing total cost while achieving required service levels.
Consolidation Strategies
Consolidating shipments improves transportation economics by spreading fixed costs across larger volumes. Order consolidation combines multiple small orders into single shipments, reducing per-unit freight costs by 20-40%. Geographic consolidation routes shipments through merge points where materials from multiple suppliers combine for final delivery. Temporal consolidation accumulates orders over time to build economical shipment sizes. Each strategy trades off transportation savings against inventory costs and delivery timing impacts.
Carrier Management and Negotiation
Carrier selection and contract negotiation significantly impact transportation costs. Competitive bidding on major lanes can reduce rates 10-20% from initial quotes. Committed volume contracts provide rate stability and capacity assurance in exchange for minimum volume guarantees. Carrier performance management addressing on-time delivery, damage rates, and billing accuracy prevents hidden costs from service failures. Strategic carrier relationships balance rate competitiveness against service quality and capacity reliability.
Multi-Modal Optimization
Combining transportation modes captures advantages of each while mitigating limitations. Sea-air combinations use ocean freight for most of the journey with air freight for final legs, offering costs 50-60% below pure air freight with transit times 1-2 weeks faster than ocean. Rail-truck intermodal moves long-haul freight by rail with truck pickup and delivery, reducing costs 15-30% versus pure trucking for distances over 500 miles. Optimization tools identify the best mode combinations for different origin-destination pairs and product characteristics.
Warehousing Costs
Warehousing provides the storage, handling, and value-added services that bridge gaps between production and consumption in supply chains. Warehousing costs include both the physical facilities and the operations within them, representing 2-5% of product cost for typical electronics operations.
Facility Cost Structures
Warehouse facility costs encompass space (rent or ownership costs), utilities, insurance, taxes, and maintenance. Industrial warehouse space costs $4-15 per square foot annually depending on location and facility quality, with climate-controlled space for sensitive electronics commanding 20-50% premiums. Owned facilities require capital investment and carry ongoing depreciation, taxes, and maintenance obligations. The choice between owned and leased facilities involves trade-offs between control and flexibility, with most electronics companies favoring leased space for operational adaptability.
Labor and Equipment
Operating costs include labor for receiving, put-away, storage, picking, packing, and shipping operations. Warehouse labor rates vary from $12-25 per hour based on location and skill requirements, with total labor costs including benefits and burden typically 30-50% above base wages. Material handling equipment (forklifts, conveyors, automated systems) adds depreciation and maintenance expenses. Labor and equipment together typically represent 40-60% of total warehousing costs, making productivity improvement a key optimization lever.
Value-Added Services
Many warehouses provide value-added services beyond basic storage, including kitting, light assembly, labeling, testing, and customization. These services add cost but can provide strategic benefits by postponing product differentiation, enabling mass customization, or reducing total supply chain cost by performing operations in optimal locations. Value-added service costing requires understanding both the direct costs of performing services and the broader supply chain implications of where activities occur.
Warehouse Network Optimization
The number, location, and size of warehouses in a network involves trade-offs between transportation costs, inventory investment, and facility expenses. More warehouses place inventory closer to customers, reducing outbound transportation cost and improving service, but increase inventory investment (more safety stock) and facility expenses (more fixed costs). Network optimization models analyze these trade-offs to identify configurations minimizing total cost while meeting service requirements. For electronics, the high value density of products often favors centralized networks that minimize inventory investment.
Third-Party Logistics Considerations
Third-party logistics (3PL) providers offer warehousing services that convert fixed costs to variable costs and provide expertise and scale economies. 3PL pricing typically includes storage charges ($15-25 per pallet position monthly), handling fees ($2-5 per case), and transaction charges for each warehouse activity. Comparing 3PL costs against internal operations requires modeling both the direct cost differences and the strategic implications of control, flexibility, and core competency considerations.
Supply Chain Simulation
Supply chain simulation uses computer models to replicate supply chain behavior under various conditions, enabling analysis of complex scenarios that exceed the capability of analytical models. Simulation is particularly valuable for understanding the impact of variability, testing policy alternatives, and planning for disruptions.
Simulation Model Types
Discrete event simulation models individual transactions (orders, shipments, production runs) as they flow through the supply chain, capturing the effects of variability in demand, lead times, and process performance. Monte Carlo simulation generates many random scenarios to understand the distribution of possible outcomes, useful for risk analysis and safety stock calculation. Agent-based simulation models individual actors (suppliers, manufacturers, customers) and their interactions, capturing emergent behavior in complex supply networks. Each approach offers different insights and computational requirements.
Modeling Demand Variability
Electronics demand exhibits significant variability from seasonal patterns, product lifecycle dynamics, and demand volatility. Simulation models incorporate this variability using historical data analysis, statistical distributions, or scenario-based demand profiles. Running simulations across many demand realizations reveals how supply chain performance varies with demand conditions, enabling design of policies robust to uncertainty rather than optimized only for expected conditions.
Supply-Side Uncertainty
Supply variability includes lead time variation, supplier quality issues, capacity constraints, and disruption risks. Simulation models capture these factors through stochastic lead times, probabilistic quality defects, and disruption scenarios. Modeling both demand and supply uncertainty simultaneously reveals their interaction effects on inventory requirements, service levels, and costs. This comprehensive view often identifies issues that analyzing either side in isolation would miss.
Policy Testing and Optimization
Simulation enables testing supply chain policies before implementation, reducing the risk and cost of real-world experimentation. Inventory policies (safety stock levels, reorder points), transportation strategies (mode selection, consolidation rules), and sourcing approaches (single vs. dual sourcing) can all be evaluated through simulation. Optimization algorithms can search across policy parameters to identify configurations that minimize cost while meeting service constraints, though the computational intensity of simulation limits the breadth of optimization possible.
Disruption and Resilience Analysis
Simulation excels at analyzing low-probability, high-impact events that historical data cannot adequately characterize. Scenarios modeling supplier failures, port closures, natural disasters, or pandemic impacts reveal supply chain vulnerabilities and test the effectiveness of mitigation strategies. This analysis supports decisions about supplier diversification, safety stock positioning, and backup logistics arrangements that improve resilience against disruptions, even though these events may never occur during the analysis period.
Implementation Considerations
Effective supply chain simulation requires accurate data on process parameters, clear definition of objectives and constraints, and validation that the model adequately represents real-world behavior. Model development and validation consume significant effort, but the resulting tool can be reused across many analyses. Organizations should invest in simulation capabilities proportional to supply chain complexity and the value of decisions being supported, recognizing that even simplified models provide insights beyond spreadsheet analysis.
Integrated Cost Modeling Platforms
Modern supply chain cost modeling increasingly relies on integrated software platforms that combine logistics, inventory, tariff, and currency analysis into unified decision support tools. These platforms enable comprehensive total cost analysis that accounts for interactions between cost elements.
Landed Cost Calculation Systems
Landed cost calculators automatically compute the total cost of delivering products from suppliers to destination, including purchase price, freight, duties, insurance, and handling. These systems maintain databases of duty rates, freight tariffs, and handling charges, applying the appropriate costs based on product classification, origin, and routing. Integration with procurement systems enables real-time landed cost visibility during sourcing decisions, ensuring that quoted prices are properly compared on a delivered cost basis.
Network Design Tools
Supply chain network design tools optimize the configuration of manufacturing locations, distribution centers, and transportation routes to minimize total cost while meeting service requirements. These tools incorporate transportation cost functions, facility cost data, and demand forecasts to recommend network structures. Advanced versions include inventory modeling, considering how network changes affect safety stock requirements throughout the supply chain. The integrated view prevents optimizing one cost element while inadvertently increasing others.
Scenario Planning Capabilities
Robust cost modeling platforms support scenario analysis testing supply chain performance under different conditions. Currency fluctuation scenarios reveal exposure to exchange rate movements. Demand scenarios test cost structures under growth, decline, or volatility conditions. Tariff scenarios model impacts of trade policy changes. This capability enables proactive planning rather than reactive responses to changing conditions, supporting strategic decisions about supply chain structure and policies.
Analytics and Reporting
Effective platforms provide analytics that translate cost data into actionable insights. Cost breakdown analysis reveals the largest cost components and identifies improvement opportunities. Trend analysis tracks cost performance over time, highlighting areas requiring attention. Benchmarking compares costs against targets, historical performance, or industry standards. Reporting capabilities communicate insights to stakeholders in accessible formats, enabling data-driven decision-making throughout the organization.
Best Practices for Supply Chain Cost Modeling
Effective supply chain cost modeling requires disciplined approaches to data management, model design, and organizational integration. Following best practices ensures that cost models deliver reliable insights supporting sound business decisions.
Data Quality and Maintenance
Cost models are only as reliable as their underlying data. Establish processes for regularly updating cost parameters including freight rates, duty schedules, exchange rates, and carrying cost factors. Validate data against actual transaction records to ensure models reflect real-world costs. Document data sources and update frequencies so users understand model currency and limitations. Invest in data infrastructure that enables efficient data collection and maintenance at the level of detail cost analysis requires.
Total Cost Perspective
Avoid sub-optimization by maintaining focus on total supply chain costs rather than individual cost elements. Lower transportation costs may increase inventory costs; reduced supplier prices may increase quality costs; faster delivery may require premium freight. Effective models capture these trade-offs, enabling decisions that optimize total cost even when individual elements increase. Communicate this total cost perspective throughout the organization to prevent well-intentioned local optimization that increases system-wide costs.
Uncertainty and Risk Integration
Supply chain costs are inherently uncertain, with variability in demand, lead times, quality, and external factors like exchange rates and tariffs. Incorporate uncertainty through sensitivity analysis, scenario planning, and probabilistic modeling rather than relying solely on point estimates. Recognize that minimum expected cost solutions may perform poorly under adverse conditions; solutions with slightly higher expected costs but lower variance often deliver better risk-adjusted outcomes.
Organizational Alignment
Supply chain cost modeling effectiveness depends on organizational adoption and appropriate use. Train users on model capabilities and limitations, ensuring they understand how to interpret results and recognize when analysis requires deeper investigation. Align incentives with total cost optimization rather than functional cost minimization. Establish governance processes ensuring models are maintained, validated, and improved over time. Successful organizations treat supply chain cost modeling as an ongoing capability rather than a one-time analysis.
Summary
Supply chain cost modeling provides essential visibility into the true costs of sourcing, storing, and delivering electronics products across global supply networks. Effective modeling captures logistics costs spanning transportation, handling, and compliance; inventory carrying costs including capital, storage, obsolescence, and risk; tariff and duty implications influenced by classification, trade agreements, and origin; and currency exposure affecting both transaction costs and competitive positioning.
Supplier cost models deconstruct quoted prices into underlying components, enabling informed negotiation and partnership development. Transportation optimization balances mode selection, routing, consolidation, and carrier management to minimize total logistics expense while meeting service requirements. Warehousing cost analysis encompasses facility costs, operating expenses, value-added services, and network design trade-offs. Supply chain simulation enables analysis of variability, policy alternatives, and disruption scenarios that exceed analytical modeling capabilities.
Integrated cost modeling platforms bring these elements together into comprehensive decision support tools that capture interactions between cost components and enable scenario analysis of changing conditions. Best practices emphasizing data quality, total cost perspective, uncertainty integration, and organizational alignment ensure that cost models deliver reliable insights supporting sound business decisions. In the complex, global supply chains that characterize modern electronics manufacturing, sophisticated cost modeling is essential for maintaining competitiveness and optimizing supply chain performance.